RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00962
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to sell back 30 days of accrued leave.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He should be allowed to sell back his accrued leave because he was
not made aware that he had to complete an AF Form 1089, Leave
Settlement Option, prior to reenlisting.
His Military Personnel Flight (MPF) did not properly advise him
that he had to complete the AF Form 1089, prior to reenlisting,
and he should not be held accountable for the mistakes of others.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 17 Sep 13, the applicant reenlisted for a period of four years
and 2 months.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends approval. DPSOA states it is clear the
applicant intended to sell back 30 days of leave. It was the
Military Personnel Sections fault that the AF Form 1089 was
signed after his reenlistment.
The applicants AF Form 1089, dated 28 Oct 13, should be honored
and the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) should pay
the applicant for the 30 days of leave he intended to sell in
conjunction with his 17 Sep 13 reenlistment.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 15 May 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice warranting corrective action.
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision
that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an
injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicants record be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that at the time of
his reenlistment in the Regular Air Force, on 17 Sep 13, he
elected to sell back thirty (30) days of unused accrued leave.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2014-00962 in Executive Session on 20 Jan 15 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Feb 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Pertinent Excerpts from Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 22 Apr 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 May 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00483
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00483 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment contract and AF Form 1089, Leave Settlement Option be amended to allow him the opportunity to sell back 30 days of accrued leave. In Jul 12, the Kadena MPF changed the date of his reenlistment contract to reflect 14 Sep 11 (his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04532
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence the applicant requested or wanted to sell back leave at the time he extended for retraining. Because this was his first extension, he was authorized to sell back a maximum...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00901
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00901 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The sixty (60) days of leave he sold at the time of his reenlistment be rescinded. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his AF Form 1089, Leave Settlement Option; DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02662
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02662 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be eligible to sell 30 days of leave. As of this date, this office has not received a response (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Commanders' Programs Branch, HQ AFPC/DPSFC, advises that the applicant states her desires were to sell 30 days upon reenlistment on 1 June 1998. A complete copy of the their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinions and states that she admits that she is guilty of having somewhat of a mental overload during the time she signed...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03879
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Military Personnel Flight (MPF) reenlistment office altered his DD Form 4/1 to reflect 8 Oct 2007 instead of the date he reenlisted (1 Oct 2007). The problem was the applicant's DOS/ETS was 7 Dec 2011 in DFAS system and 7 Jan 2012 in MILPDS (which coincides with the 8 Oct 2007 reenlistment for four years and three months); the 8 Oct 2007 reenlistment date was verified from his contract located in...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Field Operations Branch, AFPC/DPSFM, indicated the applicant stated he did not elect to sell any leave upon his reenlistment on 18 Oct 99 but lost the leave after payment was erroneously made for 37 days leave. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02111
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X meaning 1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment, be changed to a code allowing reentry in the Service. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02804
He earned 30 days of leave during FY04 and used 31 days of leave. He earned 10 days of leave between 1 Oct 04 and 31 Jan 05 and used eight days of leave. In a 23 Dec 04 letter, the applicant once again stated he did not understand he was applying for a 1 Feb 05 retirement date.